Monthly Archives

October 2025

Portfolio Diversification in today’s markets

By | Financial Planning

One of the most important decisions to make when constructing a sensible investment portfolio is to achieve the correct balance between risk and reward, which is appropriate paying regard to the risk tolerance of the investor. Naturally, investors are always keen to maximise returns where possible and they may be tempted to build a portfolio that aims to seek growth in areas that are outperforming at the time. The downside of such an approach is that this often carries additional investment risk.

An effective way of reducing portfolio risk, is to add diverse types of investments and blend them together, thus creating a diversified investment portfolio. Mathematical studies to determine the optimal diversified portfolio started over 70 years ago, with the most notable study being Harry Markowitz’ Modern Portfolio Theory in 1952, for which Markowitz won a Nobel prize. Modern Portfolio Theory first determined the most efficient way of holding assets that are either positively or negatively correlated, and introduced the notion of the Efficient Frontier, which aims to produce a set of investment portfolios that are expected to produce the highest return at a given level of risk.

Portfolio Diversification in action

The simplest form of diversification is to select investments across different asset classes, such as equities, bonds, property, commodities, and cash. Additional diversification can be achieved by investing in different regions of the world, where the growth outlook may differ.

Balancing exposure between different sectors and industries, such as technology, industrials, consumer products, energy, and finance can add further diversification. Within equity markets, stocks that offer a value bias, with a strong dividend yield and good cashflow, can be blended with more growth orientated, or smaller companies, with better prospects for growth, but at the cost of additional risk.

Practical benefits of diversification

Constructing a diversified portfolio can help reduce the overall level of risk within an investment strategy, as a diversified portfolio is less exposed to a downturn in the fortunes of a single company, industry, or country. It can also help stabilise returns, as different assets behave differently at each point of the economic cycle. For example, in a period when equity markets fall, other assets, such as fixed interest securities, may be less affected, and reduce or limit the drawdown on the portfolio value.

A diversified portfolio can also help cushion the blow if an unforeseen event occurs. A good example of this is to consider the stabilising effect of investment grade bonds and alternative assets during the initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Diversification in today’s markets

It is abundantly clear that investment markets today bear little resemblance to the stock market at the time Markowitz created the Modern Portfolio Theory. Whilst the general principle of portfolio diversification holds true today, investors need to consider whether the ever-changing investment landscape calls for portfolios to be adjusted more frequently to match shifting market trends.

Firstly, Modern Portfolio Theory assumes that investors take rational investment decisions. Increasingly we are seeing global markets driven by sentiment, with the “herd” mentality of investors focusing on a particular sector, industry, or idea. In part, passive investment funds, which track a particular index, are driving this trend. As funds are allocated in accordance with the weight a company holds in the index, more money is allocated to the largest stocks by weight, further boosting that company’s position in the index, which has a greater bearing on future index returns.

A second key point to consider is that assets that are usually uncorrelated can move in line with each other at different points in the investment cycle. For example, the Great Financial Crisis of 2007-8 had a negative impact on all asset classes, from equities to bonds to property. We have also noticed that equities and bonds are more closely correlated in periods of higher inflation. For example, shortly after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022, global inflation pushed sharply higher, and UK inflation peaked at 11.1%. As a result, most asset classes struggled during 2022, with both global equities and global bond markets falling during that year.

Finally, the pace of change in investment markets is accelerating, with new investment trends becoming mainstream more quickly than has historically been the case, due to the speed at which investors can access information. This is likely to lead to greater market distortion over time.

The importance of portfolio reviews

In today’s rapidly changing world, investment portfolios need to be able to adapt. Whilst portfolio diversification remains a tried and tested building block of any sound investment strategy, keeping a portfolio under review, to ensure the level of risk remains appropriate, is even more crucial than ever.

We often see investment portfolios and strategies that have not been properly reviewed. Frequently, the investor is unaware of additional risk due to the change in asset allocation from the original portfolio design. It is also common to see portfolios that are heavily focused on one geographic area – often the UK – and carry lower levels of exposure to global markets, which can lead to excessive risk.

You can help keep investment risk in check by regularly reviewing a portfolio and making changes where appropriate. At FAS, our ongoing advice service offers a comprehensive and robust review at regular intervals, and part of this review looks to ensure that investment portfolios remain adequately diversified. We may also recommend a rebalancing exercise, which adjusts portfolio asset allocations to maintain a preferred balance of risk and reward.

If you hold an investment portfolio that has not been reviewed recently, then speak to one of our experienced advisers. We can assess existing investment portfolios and provide tailored solutions on an advisory or discretionary basis, using our research and analysis of investment funds from across the marketplace.

FAS Investment Committee – Performance Update

By | Financial Planning

Prudent investment advice and management have been the cornerstone of the service FAS have provided clients for more than 30 years. Our advisory proposition, where bespoke investment portfolios are created to suit individual clients’ needs and objectives, has been developed and refined over decades, with the same principles providing the foundation for the range of CDI discretionary managed portfolios. These portfolios are exclusively available to clients of FAS/MGFP and have proved a popular solution for individuals, trustees and businesses alike.

As we will shortly be approaching the seventh anniversary of the inception of the CDI discretionary managed portfolios, we thought we would take this opportunity to look at how the FAS Investment Committee process continues to evolve and highlight the strong and consistent performance achieved by the CDI portfolio range.

Attention to detail

When first designing the CDI discretionary managed service, the FAS Investment Committee wanted to ensure that the years of experience managing advisory funds with a conviction-based approach carried through to the new discretionary mandates. The portfolios are still constructed using the same FAS investment process, which has been constantly refined over recent years to improve the access to available fund research and data mining capability. The frequency of fund manager meetings has also increased, with targeted sessions arranged with leading fund managers, where performance, portfolio structure, risk and market outlook is discussed.

In addition to seeking strong performance, the FAS Investment Committee have continued to focus on driving down the cost of the CDI portfolios. This has been achieved through careful fund and asset selection, together with the result of negotiations with leading fund houses to secure access to lower cost share classes. We will continue to work with fund managers and platforms to deliver the most cost-effective solution to our clients.

Consistent outperformance

The FAS Investment Committee regularly review the performance of the CDI portfolios and run comparison reports against funds within the sector benchmark every week. The Investment Committee use the Investment Association (IA) 0-35%, 20-60% and 40-85% mixed investment sectors as fair benchmarks against which to consider the performance of the Defensive, Balanced and Progressive mandates respectively. For the Adventurous portfolio, the IA Global sector is used. Reviewing the performance of the CDI portfolios against our peers is a vital part of our process and helps clients consider how their portfolio has performed against real world returns at a similar level of risk to their own portfolio.

Performance across the CDI portfolio range over the last year has been impressive, largely due to the FAS Investment Committee’s commitment to seeking the very best actively managed funds, coupled with cost effective passive exposure. Over the year to 22nd September, nine of the eleven CDI mandates stand in the first quartile when compared to the components of the representative benchmark index, with seven portfolios ranking in the first decile.

Whilst the short-term performance has been impressive, the CDI portfolio range also ranks highly against sector benchmarks over the longer term. Over the period from 22nd September 2022 to 22nd September 2025, eight out of the eleven CDI portfolios rank in the first quartile with the other three portfolios also comfortably beating their respective benchmark. Looking back further, five-year performance is similarly impressive, with eight portfolios again standing in the first quartile of performance against the sector benchmark.

Source of statistics: FE Analytics, September 2025

Risk Adjusted Returns

Naturally, performance is the key metric on which we, and of course our clients, will focus; however, the level of risk taken to achieve returns is equally important. The FAS Investment Committee consider levels of volatility at each quarterly review stage, to ensure that they remain consistent with the levels displayed by the benchmark. Where changes are made to the portfolio each quarter, the impact of the change on the historic maximum drawdown and value at risk is carefully considered.

Each CDI portfolio has a specific maximum allocation to equities, and current allocations within each portfolio are regularly monitored to ensure the asset allocation boundaries are not breached. Diversification is also carefully reviewed to ensure that any one mandate does not become overly exposed to a handful of sectors.

An evolving process

The performance of the CDI portfolio range continues to impress, and rank highly amongst sector peers. Market conditions will, of course, vary from time to time, and after a very strong period for returns from both equities and bonds, the FAS Investment Committee remain vigilant to potential risks facing the global economy and equity valuations.

Whilst the FAS Investment Committee are naturally pleased with the returns achieved since the inception of the CDI portfolios, they are very aware of the need to avoid complacency at all costs. The FAS Investment Committee will ensure that the investment process continues to evolve to meet the challenges of today’s markets and the needs and objectives of our clients.

If you hold an advisory or discretionary portfolio managed by another firm, perhaps now is the time to review the service you receive, and the performance achieved. Our experienced independent advisers can carry out an unbiased review of an existing portfolio and undertake detailed analysis of performance, risk and charges.

Speak to one of the team to discuss how the CDI discretionary managed portfolios, or our advisory services, could provide a cost-effective investment solution.

Planning to fund the cost of Care

By | Financial Planning

As we move into later life, our financial priorities often shift, and funding the cost of long-term care is a common concern. It is not surprising, given the rapid increase in the cost of nursing and residential care over recent years, and the financial impact on those who need to fund care costs.

According to recent figures from Age UK, the average weekly cost for residential care is around £949 per week, whilst full nursing care costs an average of £1,267 per week. There are, however, substantial regional differences, and we have come across situations where weekly costs for both types of care are significantly higher than the average.

Funding decisions

Local authorities have a duty to arrange appropriate levels of care, following an assessment of an individual’s needs. If there are significant health needs, NHS continuing healthcare may be available, which could cover some or all of the care costs; however, if the individual is not eligible for NHS continuing healthcare, and they hold assets greater than £23,250 (including property) they will be expected to make a contribution towards care costs, either in part or in full.

Self-funding care costs can be a daunting proposition, where financial decisions need to be made at a time of stress and worry when an individual is moving into care. Our experience shows that seeking independent financial planning advice can help alleviate these concerns, by helping families, or Attorneys appointed under a Lasting Power of Attorney, consider a range of options and agree an appropriate strategy to meet the ongoing care costs.

Financial assessment

When we first meet clients who potentially have care needs, or are moving into care, we undertake a full assessment of their capital assets, together with their income sources (e.g. pensions, attendance allowance, investment or property income) to work out the shortfall between the cost of care and other essential costs (such as personal care items and spending money) and their income.

It might be the case the individual can readily meet the shortfall between income and care, although this is typically only for those with significant investment, pension, or property rental income. In most instances, there will be a shortfall between the cost of care and income received, which will lead to erosion of capital assets over time. Individuals, or their Attorneys, will, therefore, need to make decisions about how best to deal with cash savings, investments, and property, to help stem the rate of erosion.

Immediate Needs Annuities

One option that can bridge the gap between income and care costs is to use savings, or property sale proceeds, to purchase an immediate needs annuity plan. In exchange for a capital lump sum, an insurance provider will pay a monthly amount direct to the care provider to meet the shortfall between income and care fees.

As insurers underwrite each plan, the single premium payable on purchase is dependent on the age, health, life expectancy, and care needs of the individual. In our experience, the levels of premium payable on such policies can be expensive; however, despite this cost, some may value the certainty that a care fees annuity can bring.

Once an Immediate Needs Annuity policy is in place, there is no return of capital to loved ones in the event of death of the individual in care, unless capital protection insurance is purchased, which comes at an additional cost. It is also important to consider the average life expectancy of an individual who moves into care. According to data from the Office for National Statistics, the average length of stay in care before death of a man aged 85 is around 2.5 years, with a woman of the same age expected to live for another 3.5 years. The purchase of a care fees annuity could, therefore, potentially only pay out for a limited period, leading to returns that offer poor value from the large capital outlay used to purchase the annuity.

Investment options

Building a bespoke investment plan from capital assets, which aims to limit the erosion of capital due to the shortfall between income and expenditure, is often the most appropriate route to take. Factors such as the value of any existing investments held, the tolerance to investment risk accepted and income needs all require consideration, before deciding on an investment strategy. Tax-efficiency and ease of access to funds will also be important considerations.

Cash savings will inevitably have a part to play in any sensible investment arrangement when funding care fees. It is, however, important that cash deposits remain productive and held in a tax-efficient manner.

For larger sums not immediately required to pay for care, other investment options, such as Company Shares, Corporate and Government Bonds and alternative assets, aim to generate superior returns to those available on cash, and help stem the rate of erosion of capital, so that funds held can continue to pay for care provision for an extended period or leave capital to loved ones on death. Keeping an investment strategy under review is also vital, as it is often the case that care needs change over time, and care home fees tend to rise each year in line with, or above, the rate of inflation.

Independent advice

Our experienced advisers can provide independent and unbiased advice on the best way to fund care costs, tailored to an individual’s personal circumstances. We can look across the market at annuity solutions and regularly provide advice on sensible investment strategies to keep funds productive whilst funding care costs. Speak to one of our advisers to discuss how best to pay for the cost of care.