Monthly Archives

April 2025

Pensions on Divorce – the importance of financial advice

By | Divorce

Dealing with marital finances can be one of the most challenging elements of the divorce process.  At a time when emotions are often running high, the need to gather financial information to provide a full and frank disclosure of each party’s circumstances, can be a daunting task. Perhaps the most complex area that needs to be considered is each party’s accrued pension rights.

Many people going through divorce are surprised to learn the impact the value of pensions can have on a divorce settlement. Yet, it is an area that those going through marital breakdown often ignore. Research carried out by Opinium for Legal & General found that only 13% of divorcing couples considered pension values when dividing assets. It also found that many are prepared to waive rights to their partner’s pension, potentially missing out on assets that could provide them with a more comfortable retirement.

Why are pensions so important?

For many divorcing couples, the value of pension rights may only rank second to the family home in order of value. Pension assets accrued through an individual’s lifetime should be considered when assessing the total value of marital assets that need to be disclosed, and the division of pension assets often forms part of the financial settlement.

Where pension rights are based on the length of service an individual has accrued, usually called Defined Benefit or Final Salary pensions, a Cash Equivalent Transfer Value (CETV) is usually obtained to provide a current cash equivalent of the rights accrued within the scheme. There have been reports that such calculations are taking many months to produce by schemes such as the NHS, Teachers and Police pensions. There is, sadly, no way of short cutting this process; however, patience may well be rewarded, as anyone with long standing service in a public sector scheme may well have accrued significant pension benefits, even if salaries during their working life were modest.

For those with personal pension savings, high earners or self-employed individuals may well have made substantial pension contributions over time into a personal pension, which can build into a sizeable pension pot. Assessing the value of such pension arrangements is more straightforward, although many people accrue pensions through several arrangements throughout their working life, and it may take time to uncover all pension accounts held.

Whilst most pension assets can be included in the financial assessment, State Pension provision is usually ignored.

Options for division

There are three major routes to dividing pension assets on divorce. The first is “Offsetting”, whereby the value of pension rights are retained by the individual and offset against the value of another marital asset, such as a property, savings or investments. For example, one party may forego any rights to the other party’s pension, if they retain a marital property.

Pension “Earmarking” is a less common approach, whereby rights in the pension scheme are carved out for the other marital party, but stay within the scheme. These pension benefits are then paid to the other party when they reach the normal pension age for the scheme.

Pension “Sharing” is more popular. This is where pension rights are physically divided and paid across to a new or existing pension in the other party’s name. The major benefit of this approach is to enable both parties to enjoy a “clean break” and choose how and when to take their pension benefits.

Deciding on which option to consider can be further complicated by the rules of each pension arrangement. For example, some pension schemes may not offer the ability to earmark pension rights for a spouse.

How advice can help

Financial planning advice can make a real difference to divorcing couples holding pension assets. Working in conjunction with legal professionals, our experienced advisers can consider the options for marital assets, including pensions, and provide advice, by taking a holistic approach.

Where pension assets are complex, it may well be necessary to commission an Actuary Report, which is often prepared to assess the pensions held by both spouses. Such reports not only review the value of pensions but provide calculations on the likely income each party would receive in retirement, using a range of assumptions. These reports can be long and difficult to understand. Our experienced team can review the report and use the findings to help individuals make appropriate plans for existing pension arrangements they may receive as part of a pension sharing order, or assist those whose pensions are to be split to make the right decision on which pensions are divided or transferred.

For divorcing parties, the temptation is to focus on short-term financial needs, rather than long-term goals. This is where independent advice can add value by assessing your overall financial circumstances, including pensions. We can undertake cash-flow analysis to demonstrate the potential outcome in retirement, based on which action is taken with pension credits and how these interact with other savings and investments, to build a comprehensive financial plan.

If the chosen route is to use a Pension Sharing order, we can help provide advice on how the pension credit is invested. It is crucial that a Pension Sharing Order is implemented promptly and accurately, and our administration team can work closely with pension providers to expedite the process.

At FAS, we provide truly independent financial advice, taking into account all aspects of our clients’ financial circumstances. Our advisers are experienced in assisting those going through divorce and are very used to working collaboratively with other professionals, such as Solicitors. Speak to one of our advisers to start a conversation.

What history tells us about market turbulence

By | Investments

Investment market sentiment has been fragile since the “Liberation Day” announcements by President Trump on 2nd April. The imposition of tariffs by the US, and retaliatory measures taken by trading partners, threatens to change the dynamics of global trade and the outlook for the global economy. Market volatility has increased significantly, as investors try to understand the implications for equities markets. In short, it has been an uncomfortable time to be invested in global equities.

In times when market volatility spikes, it is important to remain focused on the long-term trend, and to try and avoid taking short-term decisions that could prove detrimental to your financial well-being. History tells us that the initial knee-jerk reaction to global events, such as those invoked by the US administration currently, are often short lived. This may be even more pertinent to the current tariff-induced volatility, where policy decisions taken by the Trump administration reverse quickly and lead to a rapid rebound in stock values.

Bumps in the road are more common than you might think

It is important to recognise that periods of high market volatility are commonplace when we look back over recent history. The chart below shows the maximum drawdown – i.e. the largest move from peak to trough – in the S&P500 index of leading US shares, in each of the last 20 calendar years, from 2005 to 2024. As you can see from the chart, maximum drawdowns of more than 10% have occurred in seven of the last 20 years.

There have been specific factors behind each of the major drawdowns of the last two decades. The “Great Financial Crisis” of 2008-9 was the longest and most painful downturn of recent times. Caused by the failure of US lenders and the bursting of a US housing bubble, the fallout caused a global recession in 2009. Investors who bought the S&P500 index just before the crisis had to wait almost three years for the index level to rise above their purchase price.

The outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic created the largest global economic crisis for a generation, as lockdowns caused significant damage to public finances and global commerce.

Investors had nowhere to hide during the early stages of the pandemic, with stock markets around the World moving rapidly lower during March and April 2020. The S&P500 index fell by 29% to the low point on 23rd March 2020, but had recovered the lost ground just four months later.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 led global markets lower, as inflationary pressure rapidly increased and caused investors to re-think economic projections. Despite reacting calmly to the initial outbreak of hostilities, the S&P500 index of leading US stocks moved decisively lower a few weeks later and took just over one year to recover to a higher level than at the start of the Russian invasion.

More historic evidence

Each of the market events listed above caused a short-term re-pricing of risk assets; however, looking back through recent history provides clear evidence that investor pain following a global event is relatively short-lived. Despite the numerous temporary setbacks of the last two decades, the S&P500 index has risen by over 400% since 2005, significantly outstripping returns from other asset classes.

The need to stay invested is supported by historic data over an even longer period. The Barclays Equity Gilt Study has compiled data over more than 130 years and shows the probability of equities providing better returns than those available on cash, over a two-year investment period, is 70%. When a longer time horizon of 10 years is considered, the probability increases to over 90%. Such evidence, gleaned over an extended period, further supports the need to stay invested through periods of uncertainty.

Is this time different?

In some respects, the current bout of market turmoil is different to recent precedents, as much of the volatility has been caused by the policy decisions of the US administration. As we suspected, Trump’s actions may well be short-lived. Countries are highly likely to negotiate deals with the US administration, dampening the direct impact of tariffs. A baseline 10% tariff will cause little in the way of lasting damage to the global economy. Nations may take the imposition of tariffs as an opportunity to change trading habits to form new trading alliances to circumvent the tariff charges. Finally, Trump’s actions are not without consequences, as demonstrated by the weakness in US Treasury Bond market, and concern amongst Republican party members.

Trying to tactically move to cash, to avoid the downturn, or selling out temporarily in the hope of buying investments back at a cheaper price may sound an attractive proposition; however, such decisions are rarely successful and rely more on luck than judgement, as you may find that markets have already moved higher when you look to re-enter markets, leading to a worse outcome than would be the case by staying invested. This is particularly the case when considering the current volatility, as demonstrated by the initial market reaction to the climb down by the Trump administration.

Keep the long-term view in mind

It is important to keep your longer-term objectives in mind when dealing with turbulent markets. Equity markets are inherently volatile, and from time to time, global events push risk levels higher. Of course, we cannot predict the future, but we can learn lessons from the market’s reaction to past events.

Engaging with an independent financial adviser during periods of volatility can prove invaluable. Our advisers are experienced and can help provide reassurance during periods of market turbulence and review your personal arrangements to provide peace of mind in challenging markets. Speak to one of our friendly team to start a conversation.

Spring Statement – key takeaways for investors

By | Budget

Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered the Government’s Spring Statement on 26th March. Whilst not a full-blown Budget, pressures on the UK economy from various angles meant that the Statement contained rather more than just an update to Budget forecasts. As expected, no changes to tax legislation were announced; however, there are several key takeaways which investors should consider.

Individual Savings Account (ISA) consultation

Buried in the depths of the Statement, the Government confirmed that they will undertake a review of the current ISA rules. The aim of the review will be to look to “boost the culture of retail investment” and will consider whether the balance between cash and investments is appropriate. This appears to be a clear indication that the Cash ISA is the main target of the consultation, rather than the Stocks and Shares ISA, and therefore the impact on investors could be limited. Savers, however, could see changes to the amount that can be saved within a Cash ISA, although there is no indication as yet as to how the Government could implement any changes to the existing ISA framework. We would expect further clarity as we head towards the Budget in the Autumn.

Increased tax receipts

Amongst the slew of data presented with the Statement, projected tax receipts highlighted the impact of recent changes to tax rules when assets are sold, and on inheritance. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) expect Inheritance Tax (IHT) receipts to have climbed to £8.4bn for the 2024/25 tax year, an increase of 11.6% on the receipts from the previous year. Even more stark is the projection that IHT receipts will reach £14.3bn by 2029/30, a 70% increase over the next five years. The expected increase is due to the inclusion of pensions within the scope of IHT from April 2027, the changes to Agricultural and Business Reliefs, and the ongoing impact of the frozen Nil Rate Band.

Capital Gains Tax (CGT) is also forecast to bring increased funds into the Treasury over the rest of this parliament. The CGT exempt amount (i.e. the net amount of gain that can be made before CGT becomes payable) has been slashed from £12,300 per year to just £3,000 per year in successive Budgets, and the rates of CGT payable by investors increased immediately after the Budget last October. The OBR have forecast that CGT receipts will rise sharply to £19.7bn for the 2025/26 tax year, an increase of 48% on the amount received in the current Tax Year and reach £25.5bn by the end of this parliament in 2029/30.

With more estates being liable to IHT, and investors increasingly unable to avoid CGT, the forecasted figures are a timely reminder of the need to ensure that your financial plans are as tax efficient as possible.

Growth downgraded

The UK economy has effectively stalled over recent months, with GDP data showing very marginal gains. It was, therefore, no surprise that the OBR have downgraded their growth forecast for the UK economy in 2025 from 2% to 1%. Other leading forecasts show a weaker projection, with the Bank of England reducing their growth forecast from 1.5% to 0.75% in February.

Both forecasts may, however, be too optimistic. Households have just been hit with a succession of price hikes, from Council Tax increases to a jump in utility bills. This is likely to continue to supress consumer confidence as households grapple with higher essential expenditure. Businesses have just been impacted by the increase in minimum wage, and hike in employer’s National Insurance. This could lead to rising unemployment, and higher prices, as businesses look to offset the higher costs.

Inflationary pressure

The Chancellor received a welcome piece of news before the Statement was delivered, when the annual rate of inflation, measured by the Consumer Prices Index, fell from 3% to 2.8% in February. This does, however, remain above the Bank of England target rate of 2%.

Most economic forecasters expect inflation to rise again over the rest of this year, as a combination of tax hikes on business and higher energy costs force prices higher. In their latest inflation report, the Bank of England predict that inflation will hit 3.7% by the middle of the year, before falling back gradually.

Amidst an increasingly uncertain outlook for the global economy, we question whether these projections have properly considered the potentially disruptive impact of tariffs imposed by the US administration. On the same day as the Spring Statement, the US announced new tariffs on the import of cars and car parts from overseas, which could directly affect UK exports of luxury vehicles to the US, which is a major buyer of British marques.

Considering the range of factors, the balance of risks may point to inflation moving higher than is currently projected. This could, potentially, limit the scope for further interest rate cuts as 2025 progresses.

What should investors do?

Whilst the Spring Statement did not introduce any changes to tax legislation, it reinforced the weak outlook for the UK economy and underlined the need for investors to consider the tax-efficiency of their financial arrangements.

The ISA allowance remains a valuable tax break and a cornerstone of many financial plans. Naturally, we wait with interest to learn further details on the government review of ISA regulations; however, the indication is that Cash ISAs are more likely to be impacted than Stocks and Shares ISAs.

The projected increased tax receipts from IHT and CGT are a timely reminder of the need to plan ahead to minimise your exposure to either of these taxes. Undertaking estate planning can help reduce the potential IHT liability on your death and leave more of your estate to your loved ones. Similarly, structuring investments with tax-efficiency in mind can help reduce the likelihood of a CGT liability when assets are sold.

Our experienced advisers can carry out an impartial and holistic review of your financial arrangements and suggest changes that promote tax-efficiency and are tailored to your financial goals. Speak to one of the team to start a conversation.