All Posts By

FAS

Wooden blocks reading 2021 and 2022 - prospects for 2022

2021- the year that was, and prospects for 2022

By | Investments

As 2021 draws to a close, investors can look back on a year that still presented challenges, despite conditions being much more benign than those experienced a year earlier. Following the very sharp recession seen at the start of the pandemic, we have witnessed a broad based economic recovery, fuelled by continued economic support from central banks and governments, which has continued to provide markets with the confidence to move forward.

At the time of writing, the S&P500 index of US shares stands 27% higher than at the start of the year, whereas the FTSE100 stands 12% higher. These increases have built on the strong returns seen during the latter part of 2020. Whilst most investment markets are higher than at the start of the year, there have been areas to avoid. Chinese markets, weighed down by concerns over the debt-laden property sector and government policy, have fallen throughout the year, despite a modest recovery seen over recent weeks. The safest government bonds have also seen disappointing returns, as inflationary pressures bite.

Compared to the wild swings in sentiment seen during 2020, this year has seen more stable conditions for investment markets. Apart from some volatility around the time that the Omicron variant was discovered, investment markets have sailed through much calmer waters than was the case a year ago.

As we progressed through the year, investor attention began to shift away from the pandemic, and the increasing rate of inflation being seen in Western economies became the primary concern. In the UK, the Consumer Price Index hit 5.1% in the 12 months to November 2021, the highest level for a decade. We are not alone in facing higher inflation, with the prevailing rate in the US standing just short of 7% per annum. A number of factors have contributed to the increase in inflation – demand for goods such as building materials and microchips has outstripped supplies, and the cost of shipping goods has also risen sharply. We have all felt the impact of higher gas and electricity prices, and food prices also continue to rise. Spare capacity in the labour market may also lead to modest levels of wage inflation, as certain sectors, such as hospitality and logistics, struggle to hire employees.

The heightened rate of inflation is unlikely to be welcome news for many. Whilst higher rates of inflation are helpful in eroding levels of debt, for households struggling with increasing energy costs, and for those individuals holding cash savings, these are painful times. Central banks would ordinarily be looking to increase interest rates at this point in the economic cycle, to combat the higher rates of inflation. However, they need to tread carefully to avoid damaging the fragile economic recovery. Taking away the support and raising rates too quickly could reverse the economic gains achieved since the height of the pandemic, whereas leaving rates on hold for too long could stoke inflationary pressure further.

The Bank of England was the first to jump, raising rates from 0.10% to 0.25% this month, and we expect most Western central banks to continue raising rates during the course of 2022. The pace of these rate increases is likely to be a key factor in determining how markets perform during the course of the year, and clear forward guidance – such as we are seeing now from the Federal Reserve – will be needed to avoid markets being spooked by unexpected changes in policy.

So where do markets go in 2022, and what is in store for the coming year? Firstly, the emergence of Omicron reminds us that sadly the pandemic is not over. Investors have faced continued uncertainty in the face of the virus since March 2020, and it is becoming clear that Covid-19, and the actions taken by governments to combat the spread, is once again going to dominate market sentiment as we head through into the New Year. As we have seen over recent weeks, governments around the world appear to be keen to avoid the kind of restrictions that could deal a substantial blow to the economic recovery, but they need to balance this with the need to protect public health.

The actions of central banks will also likely have an influence on market confidence. The rapid rise in inflation may well remain a headache for policymakers throughout next year, and tough decisions on removing key support that has been in place since the start of the pandemic could have negative consequences. Inflation may well start to moderate as we move through the next 12 months, although we suspect prevailing inflation rates will stay a little higher for longer, placing further pressure on central banks and savers.

We will be watching corporate earnings closely as we move through into 2022. By and large, profits have held up well and in some sectors have exceeded expectations this year. We do, however, need to be mindful that the valuations of some sectors of the economy are now looking a little expensive.

Finally, in contrast to the calm conditions we have seen through this year, we may well see a little more volatility return as a result of Omicron and the key interest rate policy decisions that will need to be taken. For this reason, 2022 could well be a year when paying careful attention to asset allocation, and maintaining good levels of diversification, are crucial to navigate the prevailing conditions successfully. Rest assured we are here to provide guidance and reassurance whenever needed.

If you are interested in discussing the above with one of the experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

May we take this opportunity to wish you a peaceful, happy Christmas with good health and prosperity in 2022!

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute tax planning or financial advice.

Grandmother, mother, and grandchild sitting chatting - Intergenerational wealth planning explained

Intergenerational wealth planning explained

By | Tax Planning

According to probate and estate specialists an estimated £5.5 trillion will be changing hands – transferred between different generations – in the next three decades, either through inheritance or gifting. But with people living longer, and needing greater assistance with healthcare and daily living, the transition can be complicated. That’s why more people need to start thinking about how to cascade ‘intergenerational wealth’ down to children or grandchildren.

 

What is intergenerational wealth planning?

Intergenerational wealth planning is simply about taking steps to choose when and how you want to pass on your wealth to your children or grandchildren. Whether you are planning to leave behind a life-changing inheritance, or just enough to help your loved ones feel slightly better off, it’s important to understand the impact that inheritance tax (IHT) could have on the value of your estate. Every year, thousands of people pass away and leave behind an IHT bill for loved ones to deal with, drastically reducing the value of their inheritance. With the right planning in place, you can pass on more of your wealth, reduce or even eliminate any IHT due on your estate, and see your loved ones put the money to good use while you’re still alive.

 

What are the current inheritance tax thresholds?

As a reminder, everyone in the UK aged 18 or over has a personal IHT allowance known as the nil-rate band. This nil-rate band currently stands at £325,000. If the value of an estate (money, property, and possessions) when a person dies is below this amount, there is no IHT to pay. However, if the estate is valued above £325,000, the beneficiaries of the estate will be required to pay IHT at a rate of 40% on the amount over the threshold.

However, if you pass your home on to your children or grandchildren, your estate can also claim the residence nil-rate band, which is an additional IHT allowance that can increase the value of your estate excluded from IHT to £500,000. This allowance is only available provided you leave the home to your direct descendants, and the allowance is reduced if the total value of the estate is more than £2 million.

 

Making gifts

Making gifts out of your wealth before your death is an excellent way to reduce the inheritance tax on your estate, but it’s important to understand the rules around making gifts before you start giving it all away. HMRC gives everyone an annual gifting allowance of £3,000 – called the ‘annual exemption’. You can carry over the £3,000 annual exemption to the following year if you don’t use it, but only for one year.

You can also make small gifts (no more than £250) to as many different people as you wish, as long as you haven’t given them a gift as part of your £3,000 annual exemption. Wedding gifts are also IHT-exempt up to certain limits (up to £5,000 for your child, £2,500 for your grandchild or great-grandchild, and up to £1,000 for anyone else). Any gifts made between spouses or civil partners are completely IHT-free.

 

Potentially exempt transfers

Making gifts of larger amounts than £3,000 is permissible, but it does run the risk of triggering an IHT bill – particularly for people who are elderly or in poor health. This is because for a gift to become completely free of IHT, the individual making the gift must survive for at least seven years from the date the gift was made. Lifetime gifts of this type are known as ‘potentially exempt transfers’.

The IHT bill due on a potentially exempt transfer reduces on a sliding scale (also referred to as ‘taper relief’) for each full year the giver survives. So, if the giver dies within the first three years of the gift being made, the gift will be liable to the full 40% IHT charge – paid by the receiver of the gift. The IHT charge on a potentially exempt transfer falls by a further 8% for each year the giver survives (so charged at 32% if death occurs between years 3-4, charged at 24% if between 4-5 years, and so on), until seven years have passed, when the IHT bill reaches 0% and the gift becomes fully exempt.

 

Inter vivos policies

In cases where a large gift has been made, or could be made in the future, an inter vivos life insurance policy can protect against the possibility of a potentially exempt transfer failing, and falling back into an individual’s estate. Roughly translated, inter vivos means ‘between the living’, and it can be used to pay a lump sum in the event of a person’s death during a specific timeframe. The giver can arrange for the policy to have a fixed seven-year term, with the amount of cover it provides reducing to match the reduced IHT liability as taper relief starts to take effect. Although the cover reduces, the premium to pay for this type of insurance policy typically remains fixed for the whole seven years.

However, before choosing to set up a gift inter vivos policy, it is important to determine whether the available taper relief will apply in your own circumstances. This is because any lifetime gifts made will first be allocated against your nil-rate band when the gift is made. It is also worth noting that taper relief is applied to the rate of IHT to pay, not to the value of the gift. So, if a gift falls within the nil-rate band, the rate of tax is zero and therefore taper relief has no effect.

 

Summary

Over the course of this year, we’ve had more clients talking to us about estate planning and ways to reduce an IHT bill for their loved ones. Fortunately, there are lots of intergenerational wealth planning options available to clients looking to pass on more of their wealth to their children and grandchildren, and who would much prefer to see their wealth being enjoyed during their lifetime.

 

If you are interested in discussing IHT or your estate with one of the experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute tax planning or financial advice.

Egg timer running out with a stack of pound coins alongside

Tax-incentivised investments in growing companies

By | Investments

Over the years, governments have introduced, and then replaced, a variety of schemes to stimulate investment in new and small businesses. A key feature of all these schemes has been some type of tax incentive. The Treasury views these tax sweeteners as a necessary cost to attract ‘patient capital’ from private investors. The net result is that today the rules governing the three current schemes – venture capital trusts (VCT), enterprise investment schemes (EIS) and seed investment schemes (SEIS) – are highly complex. Before embarking on investment in any of this trio, it is crucial to understand the constraints that surround them, the inherent risks, as well as the potential rewards.

 

Relief on investment

All three schemes – VCT, EIS and SEIS – offer income tax relief on the initial investment into new shares, with VCT and EIS providing 30% relief, and SEIS offering 50% relief. These reliefs are subject to a number of conditions, primarily being the minimum holding periods. VCTs need to be held for at least five years and EIS and SEIS for at least three years, to avoid the relief given on investment being clawed back on disposal. In addition, it is important to note that income tax relief can only be obtained on income tax actually paid.

Over recent years, this income tax relief offered has become a key attraction for many high-income investors who find their scope for pension contributions has been constrained or eliminated completely by the reductions in the pension lifetime and annual allowances.

HM Treasury does not give tax relief without good reason. In the case of VCT, EIS and SEIS, that reason is the risk that the investor is expected to accept. This was underlined by a change to the legislation for all three schemes introduced by the Finance Act 2018. Broadly speaking, any underlying company in which investment is made must now satisfy a “risk to capital” requirement. For investments in companies that qualify for relief, the investment needs to demonstrate that the company has objectives to grow and develop over the long-term, and there needs to be a risk that there could be a loss of capital to the investor of an amount greater than the tax relief provided.

The aim of this test is to prevent low risk, growth-averse companies from being established solely for the purpose of accessing the tax reliefs available. It has had the desired effect, with VCT and EIS providers regularly reminding investors that the returns are likely to be more volatile than before the 2018 change.

 

Other tax incentives

In addition to the income tax relief on a qualifying investment, VCT dividends are tax-free and many VCTs focus on returning capital to shareholders through the payment of regular and special dividends. EIS and SEIS investments qualify for business relief after being held for 2 years’ ownership. This grants the shares in EIS and SEIS exemption from inheritance tax, as long as the shares are held until death. EIS also offers investors the ability to defer capital gains tax charges for gains made between 3 years before to 1 year after investment.

 

Risk to capital

It is important to acknowledge that investment in any of these schemes involves holding shares in very small and fledgling companies. These companies are seeking capital to help them grow, and whilst there are substantial success stories where exceptional returns have been achieved, the risk that these companies fail to deliver is also considerable. By way of example, companies that qualify for VCT funding need to hold assets of less than £15m at the time of investment and have fewer than 250 full-time employees (or 500 for so-called “knowledge-intensive” companies). SEIS qualifying companies are much smaller still, with the company needing to hold gross assets of less than £200,000 and have fewer than 25 full-time employees.

An additional risk is the fact that these investments can be hard to sell once the minimum holding period has elapsed. VCTs are listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE), but trading in smaller issues can be thin, partly because of the tax relief clawback rules. That being said, VCTs normally offer a buyback route, where the shares are re-purchased by the company at regular intervals, at a discount to the underlying asset value. EIS and SEIS investments are not quoted on the LSE, and disposing of these unquoted investments relies on finding a buyer for the shares, which can take some time.

 

The importance of advice

It’s necessary to point out that VCT, EIS, and in particular SEIS investments involve a higher level of investment risk when compared to the likes of other equities, bonds and cash. The potential returns, of course, can be higher than those provided by more traditional asset classes, and the various tax incentives are attractive.

Selection of the appropriate investment is vitally important, as there can be vast differences in performance between individual VCT and EIS funds. Different investment approaches are also taken, with some focused on a specific area or field, and others being more generalist in nature. For this reason, you should always discuss this with one of our experienced financial planners first to ensure that any VCT or EIS investment sit appropriately within your investment risk profile, time horizon, and your other assets and investments.

 

If you are interested in discussing your VCT, EIS or SEIS investments with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please do get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. 

Mature woman at laptop calculating retirement income needs

Planning for income in retirement

By | Financial Planning

Transition from work

Money concerns are never welcome when entering retirement, particularly if the opportunity to earn your way out of them is no longer open to you. For many, the transition from work to retirement is often a gradual process. We frequently speak to clients who do not want the instant change from full time employment to retirement, and indeed, it is now quite common to see employees reduce the number of days they work prior to retirement.

The latest data from the Office for National Statistics shows that 14.0% of men and 8.0% of women still work beyond age 65. With the State pension age increasing this is perhaps not a surprise. However, it is unwise to assume that you can rely on continued earnings for a long period of time. Factors such as your health, your partner’s health, your enthusiasm and the type of work you’re engaged in, could mean you have to stop work at some point. If you think you will have to continue working indefinitely, then your (non-) retirement plans almost certainly need a serious review.

 

The role of pensions

Pensions, both state and private, are usually the main source of income in later life. For growing numbers of people,  private pension income will be via income drawdown, rather than the traditional pension annuity. The drawdown approach offers flexibility suited to gradual retirement, when individuals reduce the number of days they work and replace employment income with pension income, so that standards of living can be maintained. This flexible approach can also assist in wider planning, such as considering when to take tax free cash from personal and workplace pensions, and how best to use these funds to supplement the reducing income from employment.

It goes without saying that ongoing management of pension funds in drawdown is vital. The level of withdrawals needs regular review to ensure that the correct amount is being drawn. Taking too much from a fund can mean you outlive your pension, potentially forcing you to reduce the withdrawals in much later life, or even worse exhausting the fund. In addition, taking excessive income withdrawals could also lead to unnecessary income tax charges on pension income.

To help analyse the correct rate of withdrawal, it is important to consider life expectancy, which has continued to improve over time. Since 1981, life expectancy at age 65 has increased by six years for men (to age 85) and four years for women (to age 87). Drawing too much from the plan in the early days of retirement could seriously reduce the chances of the fund sustaining the level of income throughout your life.

Inflation is also an important consideration, and one that is very topical at present due to the elevated levels we are seeing around the world. For example, the buying power of the pound has dropped by about one third since the start of 2000, and static levels of income over time are likely to lead to a significant drop in standards of living as the years progress.

For some, pensions can be a powerful tool to pass wealth between generations, if retirement income can be obtained from other sources, such as investments. Taking lower withdrawals from a pension – or indeed no withdrawals at all – can allow pension funds to build up over time, which could then be passed on your children, grandchildren, or chosen benefactors who will ultimately benefit. This can be a particularly tax efficient way of passing assets between generations for those with substantial estates, as pension assets do not normally aggregate with the remainder of the estate when inheritance tax is calculated, thus potentially saving an inheritance tax charge of 40%.

 

Investment management

If you hold investments – including those underlying your pension arrangements – they need to be managed. What you require from your investments could alter over time and investment horizons naturally tend to shorten as you get older. For example, you may wish to increase the emphasis on security of income rather than income growth. Regular reviews of asset allocations can be very helpful in identifying areas of risk and ensuring that the portfolio continues to meet your needs and objectives.

Investments can also be a useful source of retirement income, which can be used as part of an overall strategy when combined with pension income to generate a tax efficient income stream. Collective investments and direct investments can generate attractive levels of natural interest and dividends, which are tax exempt if held in an ISA wrapper.

 

Pulling it all together

To maintain a coherent approach to planning, it is important to engage with advisers who take a holistic approach to planning. Considering each aspect as part of the whole, rather than individual components, can often lead to better outcomes. A global strategy can ensure that investment risk is monitored across all aspects and income levels can be altered from flexible sources to hit precise income targets in a tax efficient manner. At FAS, holistic financial planning is at the heart of our process.

 

If you are interested in discussing your retirement income strategy with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. 

business woman dodging pitfalls - What is a default fund

The pitfalls of default funds

By | Pensions

Pensions remain one of the best ways to accumulate long-term wealth into retirement, but if you have accumulated pensions with several different employers down the years, it might be worth checking whether they are invested in default funds.

As the world of work has evolved, it’s become extremely rare for people to go through their career with the same employer. For most people, working for different companies down the years means they have accumulated several different pensions, arranged by their employers. If this sounds like you, then you might also have chosen the default pension fund suggested by the pension scheme or pension provider. If so, you’re not alone – according to research published by the Pensions Regulator, 95% of people who have defined contribution (DC) pensions arranged through their employer are invested in the scheme’s default fund.

 

What is a default fund, and why do they exist?

Whenever you start a job, you are now opted into your employer’s pension scheme unless you explicitly tell your employer you don’t want to be. If you do participate, your future pension contributions will be placed in the standard ‘default’ investment fund, and will stay there unless you decide otherwise. Employers and pension scheme trustees have a regulatory duty to ensure their default fund remains appropriate for their scheme, which means pension schemes generally take a very similar “average” approach with their employees’ money. But that doesn’t mean default funds will be the best pension option, or offer the best value, for each contributor.

It is sensible for employers and pension fund providers to encourage most people to invest in a default fund as it is designed to suit the average employee. It keeps employees invested in a pension fund which is not too aggressive, and not too conservative, but somewhere in the middle in terms of the risk profile it adopts. Furthermore, it’s low maintenance – for the employer and the employee. A default fund takes the simplest and often the cheapest route to investing a person’s pension contributions, without asking anything of the employee apart from opting in, rather than opting out. A default fund ensures the employee’s contributions are invested from day one, without them having to do anything. The fund will carry on until the employee leaves the company, or until their retirement date. Without a default fund in place, the money would be held in cash, earning a rate of growth similar to a bank account (so close to 0%).

 

What are the disadvantages of a default pension fund?

The biggest disadvantage with staying in a default fund is that the investments within it have not been tailored to suit your individual needs. Instead, they have been chosen to meet the needs of the average scheme member. The result is that their performance tends to be disappointing for too many people. At FAS, we firmly believe investments should be built around a person’s specific needs, as well as their personal attitude towards risk and preferences, such as adopting a socially responsible investment policy.

 

Are some default funds better than others?

In our experience, most older default funds suffer from a lack of diversification and perhaps questionable asset allocation (the mix of assets the fund invests in). Often, the older-style default funds have an overreliance on UK asset classes, ignoring the growth potential available across other regions and global investment markets. They could also be a bit behind in terms of investing in alternative asset classes that can be valuable for diversification purposes. Default funds also traditionally don’t react to market events, and they have a fairly rigid asset allocation, which is intended to smooth returns, but can just as easily flatten them.

Additionally, if the pension scheme was set up before pension freedoms were introduced in 2015, the default fund may still be designed for purchasing an annuity that offers a guaranteed income at retirement, whereas you may be more interested in taking advantage of the freedoms to stay invested for longer.

 

Failing to take into account your time horizon

The other big drawback with default funds is that they don’t take into account the age of the employees joining the pension scheme. This means that an 18-year-old gets placed into the same default fund as someone with just a few years to retirement. Clearly this may not be ideal for either of these employees – the 18-year-old would be well advised to take on more risk with their pension investments as they build up their retirement savings over several decades, whereas the employee approaching retirement may be better off with a lower volatility pension fund that takes fewer risks with their capital in the final few years before taking their pension.

 

Talk to us if you have older pensions invested in default funds

We know from experience that people often build up a handful of pensions managed by former employers down the years, and there’s a strong likelihood that some of these pensions may be held in more traditional default funds. So, if you think this might apply to you, let us know.

We can review your current pension arrangements – especially those older pensions with past employers that you haven’t considered for a while – and work out whether you would be better off transferring those older pensions into a new pension vehicle designed specifically for you, and has been constructed based on when you plan to access your pension savings.

 

If you are interested in discussing pension arrangements with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. 

use of trusts - man on laptop

Ensuring trust investments remain appropriate

By | Investments

The use of trusts to protect the wealth of a person (or a family), and to pass it down to their beneficiaries has been commonplace in Britain since the Middle Ages. In olden times, before knights set off to battle in The Crusades, they would create a trust to protect their financial interests and ensure their wives and children would be looked after.

While the use of trusts has long been associated with only the very wealthy, trusts have a wide number of uses and are still used today to solve a variety of financial issues, such as mitigating inheritance tax, providing income or a home for a spouse, preserving family wealth, investing for children or grandchildren, or making care provisions for vulnerable relatives. As a result, thousands of people each year are appointed as ‘lay’ trustees, and there’s also a thriving industry of professionally appointed trustees.

 

What are the responsibilities of a trustee?

Whether a lay trustee or a professional, whoever is appointed as a trustee owes duties of honesty, integrity, loyalty, and good faith to the beneficiaries of the trust. They must act exclusively in the best interests of the trust and be actively involved in any decisions. The general duties of trustees include:

  • To observe the terms of the trust, and follow any duties and directions set out in the trust deed
  • To act impartially when dealing with one or more beneficiaries, and balance competing interests
  • To keep records and accounts for the trust and provide information when required
  • To act unanimously, carefully, and to distribute assets correctly

 

What duties do trustees have when investing trust funds?

Trustees also have clear and specific responsibilities when it comes to managing investments, which centre on following the duty of care towards beneficiaries and acting in their best interests. For example, while in most instances trustees are able to invest in any type of asset (unless the trust deed specifically restricts some investments), the trustees must consider the purpose of the trust, and – most importantly – the needs of the beneficiaries when establishing the investment policy.

 

Choosing the right investments

A trustee also must, from time to time, review the investments in the trust and make sure they are still appropriate. This is often the area of responsibility that lay trustees and indeed professional trustees overlook. In our experience, it’s all too common that after a trust is set up and investments are made, the continued monitoring and oversight of the investments is forgotten about. Not only is this ignoring the responsibilities of the trust, but if investments are left alone and underperform over several years, the loss of capital could have disastrous consequences for the beneficiaries.

 

What are the risks of not doing anything?

If you have been appointed as a trustee, you could be liable if beneficiaries feel that the trust has been mismanaged and this includes the investment decisions made. Ultimately, this could lead to a trustee being taken to court by the beneficiaries to recover any amount of money lost due to trustee negligence or mismanagement. It’s important to note that a lay trustee who is not acting in a professional capacity is just as liable as a professionally appointed trustee.

Therefore, anyone appointed as a trustee – professional or otherwise – has a personal responsibility to take advice that ensures funds placed in a trust have been appropriately invested, and that the funds are monitored and regularly reviewed.

 

Can people get help with their duties as a trustee?

Managing a trust can be complicated at the best of times. It’s important to keep up with the rules relating to trusts, as well as any new legislation that crops up. The good news is that trustees can get professional help from financial planners, accountants, and solicitors. When it comes to managing investments, we think it’s in the best interests of the beneficiaries and the trustees that advice is sought – and taken – from professional financial planners like us. We can help to make sure the investments held in the trust are on course to meet their objectives, and we can carry out other key tasks, such as ensuring the trust is properly structured, and that investments are tax-efficient and well diversified where necessary.

Acting as a trustee is a privilege, but it doesn’t also have to be a burden, provided trustee responsibilities are carried out as fully as possible. Where necessary, it’s a good idea to take professional financial advice before making decisions – particularly investment decisions – on the trust, and to ensure regular reviews are carried out.


If you are interested in discussing trust arrangements with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice.

Piggy bank in the middle of an animal trap

Don’t fall into the Money Purchase Annual Allowance tax trap

By | Pensions

When “pension freedoms” were introduced, many saw it as a great way to access their pension well before retirement age. But the tax incentives with pensions can often prove too valuable to give up, and hasty decisions risk leaving some people worse-off in the long run.  

 

What is the Money Purchase Annual Allowance?

The Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA) was introduced as part of a range of pension changes carried out by the government back in 2015. One of the changes that some have taken advantage of is the ability to take out up to 25% of your pension as a tax-free lump sum, with the remaining 75% still subject to tax. Back then, the rule changes were touted as being ‘pension freedoms’, although some of these freedoms do carry a bit of a sting in the tail.

 

Understanding pension allowances

Whenever you or your employer pays money into your pension, the government tops up your contribution with tax relief. For most people, the amount they can pay into their pension each tax year and get tax-relief on is limited to an annual contribution of £40,000. Also, when you make contributions to your pension, you benefit from being able to use the ‘carry forward’ rule, which means you can claim any tax relief you haven’t used for pension contributions made in the previous three tax years.

However, the government’s generosity when it comes to offering tax incentives while you accumulate your pension pot get swiftly taken away once you decide to access your pension. The MPAA is triggered once you’ve started to draw on the taxable part of your pension (this doesn’t include the tax-free lump sum you are entitled to) and from that point forward, the MPAA effectively limits the amount of tax relief you can receive on any future pension contributions.

Back in 2015, when the MPAA was first introduced, the annual contribution limit for those affected by the MPAA was set at £10,000, rather than the full £40,000 Annual Allowance. However, this limit has now shrunk significantly and, for the 2021/22 tax year, the MPAA is set at just £4,000. This means that if you’ve triggered the MPAA you can expect to pay tax on all future pension contributions above this amount, and the MPAA will be with you for life.

 

Who risks being caught in the MPAA trap?

The MPAA only affects those with defined contribution (DC) pensions, and who have chosen to access their pension flexibly, including self-invested personal pensions (SIPP). Money purchase restrictions do not affect defined benefit (DB) pensions.

Should you start to make use of pension freedoms to flexibly access your pension, you will trigger the MPAA, which means you will only then be able to contribute up to £4,000 to all your DC pensions each year. Also, you will not be able to make use of any unused pension contribution allowances (known as ‘carry forward’) from previous tax years.

We have heard examples of people who have taken out their tax-free lump sum, and then topped up this amount by drawing down a smaller amount from their taxable pension. Unfortunately, this is just the type of activity where the MPAA rules are catching people out.

 

What happens if you break the rules?

If you do happen to go over your annual contribution limits, then you should expect HMRC to catch up with you at some point. When they do, you will face a tax charge in line with the rate of tax you pay.

 

Example: Meet Victoria

Here’s a quick example of what can easily lead someone into falling foul of the rules. Victoria has £100,000 invested in her personal pension, and is also still a member of her employer’s pension scheme. Victoria would like to build a new conservatory, which costs £25,000, and would also like to draw down an extra £5,000 for a holiday. She instructs her pension provider to drawdown £30,000, knowing that she will pay tax on the £5,000 above the tax-free lump sum (25% of the pension) available.

Unfortunately, once Victoria takes out the £30,000, she has triggered the MPAA, because she has withdrawn more than the 25% tax-free element of her personal pension and is deemed by HMRC to have ‘flexibly accessed her pension’. Had Victoria chosen to get financial advice before contacting her SIPP provider, she would have been made aware of the dangers of triggering the MPAA and revised her plans accordingly. Instead, from now on, Victoria will only be able to contribute an annual maximum of £4,000 across all her pensions, which could well prove costly as any contributions above this level will attract a tax charge.

 

When does the MPAA not apply?

It’s definitely worth remembering that you won’t trigger the MPAA if you only withdraw from your pension an amount that doesn’t exceed your 25% tax-free lump entitlement. You also will not trigger the MPAA if you use your pension to purchase a lifetime annuity, or if the cash accumulated in your pension pot is valued at less than £10,000.

If anyone is considering accessing their pension, and taking advantage of ‘pension freedoms’, we suggest you talk to us first. We can help you to work out the most tax-efficient way of accessing your pension, without making any costly mistakes that could leave you worse off in the future.

 

If you are interested in discussing your current pension arrangements with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. 

Older lady in a wheelchair outside with a female carer

Are long-term care annuities value for money?

By | Financial Planning

The rising cost of care has been hitting the headlines lately, which has placed the spotlight on long-term care annuities designed to pay out for the rest of a person’s life. But these annuities may not be the best solution for everyone.

The costs of long-term care are increasing. According to LaingBuisson, an independent provider of healthcare statistics, the average cost of residential care home fees for someone in the UK increased to £672 a week (almost £35,000 a year) in the 2019-2020 tax year, an increase of 3.0% on the average fees in the previous tax year. Over the same period, the costs associated with nursing homes – where residents receive round-the-clock care – reached an average of £937 per week, almost £49,000 a year, an uptick of 5%.

Despite recent announcements from the government that National Insurance and Dividend Tax will be increasing to help to pay for the cost of social care, most people will have to pay for their own care as they get older. And with around one-fifth of the UK population – or 12.3 million people – aged 65 or older (figures published in 2019), it’s not surprising that more people are considering taking out some sort of insurance policy to help pay the future costs of care. These products are also known as ‘long-term care annuity’ or ‘immediate needs annuity’. With both, you use a lump sum to buy an insurance policy that pays out a regular lifetime income. This income is then yours to help fund your care fees for as long as you live. While a long-term care annuity might seem like an appealing option, giving you some much-needed peace of mind, they have several limitations that everyone should be aware of before they take one out.

 

What types of long-term care annuities are available?

Broadly speaking, there are two options when it comes to the types of long-term care annuities currently available, depending on whether you need care funding now, or expect to need to fund care in the future. The first is an ‘immediate needs’ annuity, and the second is a ‘deferred annuity’. We explore both of these in a bit more depth below.

 

An immediate needs annuity

This is an insurance policy designed to pay a regular income towards the cost of your care fees over the course of your lifetime. An immediate needs annuity is usually considered appropriate if the individual has health issues or is already receiving care at home or in a care home.

The annuity is bought upfront, with a single payment. The amount you must pay to buy the annuity will be calculated based on factors such as your age, your health, and the expected costs of current and future care. If you’re in poor health, you can expect to pay a lower price for the annuity, given the length of time you will need to pay for care will most likely be shorter than for someone in good health.

 

Disadvantages of an immediate needs annuity

There are several drawbacks that mean immediate needs annuities may not offer the best value to someone in need of long-term care. For starters, the initial cost of the annuity can be staggering, and can eat up much of an individual’s capital assets. Whilst the average stay in care is 26 months, sadly many survive for a much shorter period of time in care, and in these cases, the return on the annuity purchased can prove to be very poor value. Usually, if an individual dies shortly after taking out an immediate needs annuity, there is no return of capital to the estate, leaving beneficiaries in the will significantly worse off.

Second, taking out an immediate needs annuity can take longer than the name would have you believe. As annuities are insurance policies, they have to be underwritten, which means the annuity provider will first collect information about your health from your GP, family and current care provider. Third, if your annuity doesn’t allow for care fee increases, it may not even cover all of your future care costs. If this happens, you will have to make up the shortfall through other means.

 

A deferred annuity

A deferred annuity is similar to an immediate needs annuity, although having bought the annuity, you won’t begin to receive the income payments immediately. Instead, you choose when you want to be paid income, usually between one and five years in the future. The longer the deferred period, the lower the cost of the plan overall.

 

The disadvantages of a deferred annuity

As you would expect, while cheaper than an immediate needs annuity, a deferred annuity still requires an upfront payment. Should you need to pay for care fees sooner than anticipated, you’ll be expected to pay these fees until the deferred annuity income starts. The worst-case scenario would be that care costs increased to levels that saw you run out of money before the deferred annuity kicks in.

It’s also worth noting that the income from your annuity will be taxed at your marginal rate and may also affect your entitlement to means-tested benefits. This applies to immediate needs annuities too.

 

Are long-term care annuities value for money?

The answer to this question really depends on the particular circumstances of the person who is in need of care. We would suggest that the number of people who would benefit from a long-term care annuity is actually rather small, and that it’s a specialist product for those with urgent care needs, and where leaving behind an estate is not a key factor. For the vast majority of people looking to make long-term care plans, other options might offer better value and suit their longer term objectives.

For example, instead of using capital to buy an annuity to pay for care, we often suggest an alternative where funds remain invested and capital is drawn down when required. This is a more flexible approach, and gives your money the chance to keep growing while it’s not needed. The added benefit of this is that upon death, the remaining capital is still available to form part of a person’s estate, and therefore left to beneficiaries.

 

If you are interested in discussing long-term care arrangements with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. 

Rubber stamp reading Dividends stamped onto a piece of paper

Reinvesting dividends: the power of compound interest

By | Investments

After a horrible 2020 for dividend paying companies, this year has been an encouraging return to form. Investors can’t afford to ignore the benefits of reinvesting dividends.

Good news: the COVID-induced dividend drought appears to be over. After a terrible 12 months, when most dividend-paying companies in the financial services, property, and oil and gas sectors were forced to suspend or drastically reduce dividend pay-outs to shareholders, 2021 has seen a sparkling recovery.

Dividends are usually considered to be a good sign that a company is doing well, and has plenty of spare cash in the bank. But the UK’s reputation for dividend payments took a battering during 2020 thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, forcing companies to take widespread and often drastic measures to keep operating during a period of uncertainty. As a result, last year the FTSE 100 average dividend yield for 2020 overall ended up at a significantly lower 2.98%, and total dividends paid to investors fell to £61.4 billion. However, stockbroking firm AJ Bell expects FTSE 100 dividend payments to bounce-back to an impressive £85.1 billion this year, just short of the record-breaking peak of £85.2 billion in dividend pay-outs set in 2018.

 

Dividend tax is on the increase

Of course, the downside is that the government has now introduced a 1.25% increase in dividend tax to help pay the bill caused by COVID-19, and to increase spending on health and social care. As a reminder of the government’s tax plans, investors can still earn up to £2,000 in dividends before they are liable for any tax. But beyond that threshold, basic rate taxpayers can expect to pay dividend tax at a rate of 8.75% from the 2022-2023 tax year. Higher rate taxpayers will see their dividend tax rate increase to 33.75%, while additional rate taxpayers (earning more than £150,000) in England will pay dividend tax at 39.35%. It’s worth remembering that investors do not pay any dividend tax on money invested in an Individual Savings Account (ISA), which is why it’s essential to always use up your tax-free ISA allowances.

 

Why it pays to reinvest dividends

Dividend paying companies are very attractive within any investment portfolio, but you don’t have to collect the regular dividend payments. In fact, it’s well worth using the dividends instead to purchase additional shares – which in turn also pay out future dividends. This is known as the power of compound interest.

Here’s a quick example to show what we mean. You buy 100 shares in a company at a cost of £1,000. The company pays a dividend of £6 every year for ten years. Instead of pocketing the cash, you reinvest your dividends and you use the money instead to buy more shares in the company. As time passes, a dividend reinvestment strategy starts to become the largest contributor to total return. The more dividends you reinvest, the higher your future dividend payments.

Take the following example of the FTSE100 index over the last 20 years (see graph below). The red line shows the pure performance of the index, not taking any dividend income into account. As you can see, the index value has increased by more than 40% over the last 20 years.

However, this performance is a fraction of the total return achieved over the same period, when dividend income from the FTSE100 constituents is reinvested. You can see the total return including reinvested dividends, shown in blue, has returned 193% over the same 20 year period, almost five times the return of the raw index.

Graph showing FTSE 100 index over the past 20 years

The effect of compound interest on reinvested dividends is more powerful the longer you invest, as it multiplies the available returns on the original investment. Over time, the dividends reinvested in the early years have the largest impact on total returns, and you stand to benefit not just from the increased value of the company’s shares, which may fluctuate over time, but also from the larger shareholding as you’ve used the dividend proceeds to buy more shares, which means more dividend proceeds, and so on. It’s a great way to increase the value of your investment without lifting a finger.

 

Last thoughts

Of course, dividend payments received by investors are still liable for dividend tax, even if they are automatically reinvested. But for the time being, investors still have a dividend allowance of £2,000, which means for the first £2,000 of any dividends you receive you don’t need to tell HMRC or record the dividends on your self-assessment form.

If you’re unsure whether your investments will mean you pay dividend tax, please get in touch. We’d be happy to provide you with a report on your dividend situation, as well as recommending ways to get the most out of your tax-free allowances. You may not be able to avoid paying dividend tax, but we can help to make sure you get the best value from the dividends you earn on your investments.

If you are interested in discussing your investment strategy with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice. 

Businessman at a crossroads

Sticking to the Path may not be the best option

By | Investments

Investment Pathways for Retirement Planning is a new initiative launched by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in February 2021, designed for people who wish to draw their pension under a Drawdown arrangement, without first obtaining regulated financial advice. As we will explore, one size does not fit all, and forging your own bespoke path, whilst taking ongoing advice, may well lead to better outcomes.

 

Taking a flexible approach

Flexi-Access Drawdown is an alternative to the purchase of an annuity, which provides much greater flexibility in terms of how income is drawn in retirement. It is increasingly popular, as it can offer the potential for individuals to use their pension savings to best fit their needs and objectives, but unlike a pension annuity, does not provide a guaranteed income for life. As the pension fund continues to be invested throughout retirement under Drawdown, investment decisions and careful management of the fund are critical components of a successful Drawdown approach. Personal responsibility for the long-term viability of the pension drawdown plan rests with the pension holder, hence the importance of receiving initial advice on the level of income drawn and investment options, and reviewing the plan regularly to ensure that it continues to meet the initial objectives.

 

Choose a Path?

The idea behind Investment Pathways is to create four default investment routes for individuals who have already taken Tax Free Cash from their pension, leaving the remaining funds in Drawdown. The FCA hope the initiative will reduce the number of individuals, who decide to enter Drawdown without receiving advice, making poor investment decisions, such as leaving significant funds in Cash for the long term, or taking excessive investment risk.

Four Paths have been defined, with the first being aimed at those who have no intention of drawing an income in the next five years. This strategy is largely aimed at growth over the medium term. The second Path is designed for those who wish to purchase an annuity in the next five years and will aim to preserve capital. The third is for those who are considering drawing income in the medium term and will aim to provide a balanced approach. The final Path is for those who are looking to draw the full value of their pension in the next five years, and again aims to preserve the capital value.

For each defined Pathway, pension providers will produce a ready-made investment portfolio which aims to meet the objective of the Pathway, which is where we feel the proposals may begin to fall short of their objectives.

The majority of providers offering these Pathways are using a single passive investment fund, with no ability to vary the investment options within the Pathway selected. This limits the scope for an individual to select alternative funds within an individual Pathway, or to access funds that meet their own preferences, for example, to invest in a socially responsible manner.

 

Bespoke is best

But more importantly, the Pathways do not take into account an individual’s financial circumstances, objectives or attitude to investment risk. This is a vital element of the advice process that is missed by using this automated approach. Take an individual who prefers to take a cautious approach to investment as an example. They choose the third of the fourth automated pathways, as they are considering drawing income from the pension in the next five years. In this scenario, they could experience an increase in investment risk and volatility over their existing arrangements they held before entering the Pathway approach, which they may not be aware of, or may be contrary to their wishes.

Conversely, an individual who chooses the Pathway towards taking the full value of their pension in the next five years (option four) would be placed largely in a Cash fund with most providers, where negative real returns are more than likely to be achieved when charges, and the eroding effects of inflation, are taken into account. We don’t imagine someone who is planning to draw their fund out in five years’ time will be pleased to be missing out on the potential for investment returns over this period, even if they were taking a cautious investment approach.

 

Tailored to your needs

We understand the Regulator’s concerns. Without proper advice, individuals could leave their pensions in Cash over the longer term or take excessive risk with their pension arrangements, neither of which are likely to be appropriate. However, we feel that Investment Pathways are too rigid and inflexible for most individuals with at least modest sized pension plans, who are considering Flexi-Access Drawdown as an approach to retirement planning. For these individuals, we believe that Investment Pathways are no substitute to taking an alternative path, via independent advice, that is tailored to their own circumstances and objectives. Furthermore, regular reviews of any Drawdown are of high importance, to ensure the approach remains appropriate to any future change in circumstances.

 

If you are considering your retirement planning and would like to discuss your options with one of our experienced financial planners at FAS, please get in touch here.

 

This content is for information purposes only. It does not constitute investment advice or financial advice.